A viatical settlement provides individuals with terminal or chronic illnesses a lump-sum cash payment by selling their life insurance policy, offering financial relief for medical bills, living expenses, or other needs. While the funds can generally be used at the policyholder’s discretion, certain limits and considerations may apply, particularly related to legal, tax, and eligibility implications. This guide explores the key factors affecting how viatical settlement funds can be spent, organized into sections for clarity.
Table of Contents
1. General Freedom of Use
Viatical settlement funds are typically unrestricted, allowing flexibility in spending.
-
No Direct Restrictions: Unlike some financial instruments, viatical settlements do not come with explicit rules dictating how the lump sum must be spent. Policyholders can use the funds for medical treatments, palliative care, debt repayment, or personal desires like travel or family support.
-
Common Uses: Many use the funds to cover high medical costs, maintain quality of life, or preserve other assets, such as a home, which they may not want to sell.
-
Personal Discretion: The lump sum belongs entirely to the seller, and no repayment is required, unlike loans against a policy.
Key Takeaway: Viatical settlement funds offer significant flexibility, allowing policyholders to address immediate financial needs or personal priorities without direct spending restrictions.
2. Tax Implications
While viatical settlements are often tax-free, certain conditions may affect how funds are spent to maintain this status.
-
Federal Tax Exemption: For terminally or chronically ill individuals, viatical settlement proceeds are generally federal income tax-free if the provider is licensed and the policyholder meets specific health criteria (e.g., life expectancy of two years or less certified by a physician).
-
State Tax Variations: Some states follow federal guidelines, while others may impose taxes or have different rules. Spending funds without consulting a tax advisor could lead to unexpected tax liabilities in certain jurisdictions.
-
Impact on Other Benefits: Large cash influxes may affect eligibility for means-tested programs like Medicaid or Supplemental Security Income (SSI). To avoid penalties, funds should ideally be spent or transferred in the same month received to stay within resource limits.
Key Takeaway: While viatical settlements are often tax-free, careful planning with a tax advisor is essential to avoid state-specific taxes or loss of public benefits.
3. Eligibility for Public Assistance Programs
Spending viatical settlement funds can impact eligibility for government assistance, imposing indirect limits.
-
Medicaid and SSI Eligibility: A lump-sum payment may push resources above Medicaid or SSI limits, potentially making the recipient ineligible. Spending or transferring the funds in the same month received can limit ineligibility to one month.
-
Medicaid Spend-Down Programs: For non-MAGI Medicaid, recipients may qualify for “excess income” or “spend-down” programs by using funds to pay medical bills, potentially preserving eligibility.
-
Strategic Spending: Consulting with a financial or legal advisor can help structure spending to maintain eligibility, such as using funds for exempt assets (e.g., home improvements) or medical expenses.
Key Takeaway: Strategic spending or transferring of funds is critical to avoid jeopardizing eligibility for Medicaid, SSI, or other assistance programs.
4. Contractual and Legal Considerations
Certain contractual or legal factors may influence how viatical settlement funds are used.
-
Creditor Claims: In some cases, creditors may attempt to claim viatical settlement proceeds to settle debts, depending on state laws and the policyholder’s financial situation. Consulting an accountant or attorney is advisable to clarify protections.
-
Policy Terms and Conditions: Some life insurance policies may have clauses affecting settlement proceeds, such as contestability periods (typically two years) or suicide clauses, which could impact the payout if not fully disclosed to the buyer.
-
State Regulations: States like Illinois prohibit viatical settlements within two years of policy issuance unless specific conditions, such as a terminal illness diagnosis, are met. This indirectly limits how funds can be accessed or used early in a policy’s life.
Key Takeaway: Legal and contractual nuances may impose indirect limits, requiring consultation with professionals to ensure compliance and protect funds.
5. Practical Considerations for Spending
Practical factors, such as the amount received and personal circumstances, influence how funds are best spent.
-
Payout Variability: Viatical settlements typically range from 50% to 80% of the policy’s death benefit, depending on life expectancy, policy type, and premium costs. Smaller payouts may limit spending options.
-
Prioritizing Needs: Policyholders often prioritize medical expenses, hospice care, or debt repayment to reduce financial stress. Using funds for non-essential purposes may deplete resources needed for critical care.
-
Long-Term Planning: Spending funds without a plan could leave policyholders or their families vulnerable if additional expenses arise. Financial advisors can help allocate funds for sustained support.
Key Takeaway: The amount and timing of spending should align with immediate and long-term needs to maximize financial relief.
Conclusion
Viatical settlement funds offer significant flexibility for terminally or chronically ill individuals to address financial needs, from medical bills to personal goals. However, indirect limits arise from tax implications, eligibility for public assistance, legal considerations, and practical constraints. By consulting tax advisors, financial planners, or legal professionals, policyholders can strategically manage funds to maintain benefits, comply with regulations, and optimize their quality of life. Careful planning ensures that viatical settlements provide meaningful financial relief without unintended consequences.